[2023-2024] How to dramatically reduce your risk of having a cesarean section [gn]
This is the gender-neutral language version (e.g. “parent”, “pregnant person”, “birthing person”, “breast/chestfeeding”).
Also available: woman-centric language version (e.g. “mother”, “pregnant woman”, “birthing women”, “breastfeeding”).
By far, the simplest and most effective way to avoid an unnecessary C-section is to choose a hospital or other birth setting with a low C-section rate. This article explains why this measure is so important. At the bottom of the article you’ll find a list of birth settings in the Chicago-area that you should consider if it’s important to you to avoid an unnecessary C-section.
This guide to C-section rates in the Chicago-area can help you minimize your risk of having a cesarean birth
Most birthing people would prefer to avoid a cesarean unless absolutely necessary. And yet many, many end up having C-sections that are not medically necessary.
One of the ways we know this is that “primary C-section rates” vary dramatically from hospital to hospital, even where outcomes do not.
What is a “primary C-Section” rate?
The primary C-section rate for an individual hospital looks only at the population of births at that hospital in the reporting year to people who had not had a prior C-section.
For the data we use in this article, the rate is defined as:
the number of low-risk* people in that population who ended up giving birth by Cesarean section
divided by
the total number of low-risk* people in that population, including both those who ended up giving birth vaginally and those who had a first-time C-section.
*”Low risk” is defined by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) and means birthing people who are at term, with only one baby, who is presenting normally, and no fetal death.
[Note: If this is your first baby, or if all your prior births were vaginal births, then the primary C-section rate is the rate you care about. If you’ve had a C-section in the past, then you should look at hospital VBAC rates instead.]
Here in the Chicago-area, primary C-section rates at individual hospitals range from 7.4% to 24.6%, but higher rates are not generally associated with better outcomes. This means that too many birthing people are suffering the discomforts and risks of a major surgery that didn’t actually benefit them or their baby.
The good news here is that you can dramatically reduce the likelihood that you’ll have a cesarean simply by making a thoughtful choice about where to have your baby.
Whether you will have a C-section with this pregnancy depends largely on where you give birth.
The best way to understand why C-section rates are so important is to look at the data.
Let’s start by looking at the 8 Chicago-area hospitals with the lowest primary C-section rates. [These are the 8 hospitals with primary C-section rates at least one standard deviation lower than the mean for all hospitals in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties during the reporting period Oct 2021- Sept 2022.]
At these 8 hospitals, 5950 low-risk people gave birth who had not had a prior C-section, and 614 of those ended up giving birth by cesarean. That’s an overall rate of 10.3%.
Now let’s look at the 7 Chicago-area hospitals with the highest primary C-section rates. [These are the 7 hospitals with primary C-section rates at least one standard deviation higher than the mean for same group of hospitals.]
At these 7 hospitals, 7217 low-risk people gave birth who had not had a prior C-section, and 1517 of those ended up giving birth by cesarean. That’s an overall rate of 21.0%. (Note that these are risk-adjusted rates, which means that the differences cannot be explained away by risk factors in the populations served by each hospital.)
That means that over half of the primary C-sections at hospitals with high rates could have been avoided if those birthing people had instead given birth at one of the hospitals with low rates.
Those percentages represent real individuals whose C-section was caused by their choice of hospital.
Imagine if all the 7217 birthing people who gave birth at hospitals with the highest rates had instead given birth at hospitals with the lowest rates. Only about 10.3% of them — or 749 people — would have had C-sections. That’s 768 fewer C-sections (1517 – 749 = 768), which means that nearly 800 Chicago-area birthing people could have avoided their cesarean section simply by choosing a hospital with one of the lowest primary C-section rate instead of a hospital with one of the highest rates.
This why it is so important to look at C-section rates when you are deciding where to have your baby. Putting it simply, choosing a hospital with one of the lowest rates over a hospital with one of the highest rates can cut your risk of having a cesarean in half.
You can see the primary cesarean rate for any Chicago-area hospital by searching in the Home Birth, Birth Centers and Hospitals Directory.
C-section rates are generally lower for those who choose midwife care in a hospital. Rates are lowest of all for those who choose to give birth at home or at a freestanding birth center. Learn more about your options for midwife-attended and out-of-hospital birth below.
Which hospitals have the lowest c-section rates in the Chicago-area?
According to the most recent data reported by the Illinois Department of Public Health, the lowest cesarean rates for Chicago-area hospitals are:
Hospital | Risk-adjusted Primary C-section Rate | # of primary C-sections | # of births to people with no prior C-section |
Roseland Community Hospital | 7.407407 | 6 | 81 |
Advocate Trinity Hospital | 8.06846 | 33 | 409 |
AdventHealth GlenOaks | 9.139785 | 17 | 186 |
Northshore Univ HS Evanston Hospital | 10.136364 | 223 | 2200 |
Saint Anthony Hospital | 10.143198 | 85 | 838 |
Northwestern Medicine McHenry Hospital | 10.41667 | 15 | 144 |
Northshore Univ HS Swedish Hospital | 11.095306 | 156 | 1406 |
Vista Medical Center East | 11.516035 | 79 | 686 |
Midwife practices at the following hospitals have self-reported primary C-section rates that are similarly low
Some hospitals provide data on their midwife practices’ outcomes, including primary C-section rates.
Midwives do not perform C-sections, so these cesarean rates reflect the number of mothers who began labor in the care of the midwives and ended up having a C-section performed by a surgeon. These rates are not risk-adjusted, and should not be directly compared to the overall rates for Chicago-area hospitals reported above. But if you qualify for care and begin your labor with one of these hospital-based midwife practices, the likelihood that you will have a cesarean birth is as low as at the hospitals with the lowest rates.
The following hospital midwifery practices have rates that are comparably low to the lowest overall hospital rates reported above:
[DATA BELOW IS OUT OF DATE AND WILL BE UPDATED SHORTLY]
Primary C-section rates are lowest of all for those who choose to give birth at home or in a freestanding birth center
Here in the Chicago-area, birthing people who plan to give birth at home or in a freestanding birth center have a 3 – 4% chance of ending up with a cesarean. That’s two to four times lower than the lowest hospital rates (which range from about 7% to 11%), and six to eight times lower than the highest hospital rates (which range from about 19% to 24%).
Of course, those who qualify to give birth in these out-of-hospital settings are very low-risk to begin with, so they are less likely to need a c-section wherever they give birth. And since these out-of-hospital rates are self-reported and not risk-adjusted, they cannot be compared directly to the primary cesarean rates at hospitals.
Still, if you qualify to give birth at home or at a freestanding birth center, these rates do give you a fair picture of how very low your cesarean risk could be. If avoiding a C-section is a top priority for you, these could be good options to consider.
BirthGuide offers lots of information to help you decide. You can take the “where should I have my baby?” questionnaire to see if home birth or a birth center might right for you. You can also hear birth stories, learn more about the pros and cons of each setting, compare home birth and birth centers to hospital birth, and find home birth midwives and birth centers. [Note: This content is not currently available in gender-neutral language versions.]
Additional hospitals with lower than average primary C-section rates
The following additional hospitals have primary C-section rates that are better (lower) than the average for hospitals in our area (but not as low as the 8 hospitals with the lowest rates listed above):
Hospital | Risk-adjusted Primary C-section Rate | # of primary C-sections | # of births to people with no prior C-section |
Elmhurst Memorial | 12.2 | 265 | 2166 |
Ascension Alexian Brothers | 12.3 | 150 | 1218 |
Advocate Good Shepherd Hospital | 12.5 | 98 | 781 |
Humboldt Park Health | 12.6 | 20 | 159 |
UChicago Medicine Ingalls Memorial | 13.1 | 50 | 382 |
Mount Sinai Hospital | 13.2 | 119 | 904 |
Advocate Condell Medical Center | 13.3 | 95 | 714 |
Northshore Univ HS Highland Park Hospital | 13.4 | 131 | 977 |
Rush Copley Medical Center | 13.5 | 238 | 1762 |
Northshore Univ HS NW Community Hospital | 13.8 | 235 | 1708 |
Loyola MacNeal Hospital | 13.9 | 77 | 553 |
Northwestern Memorial Hospital | 14.18 | 1213 | 8625 |
West Suburban Medical Center | 14.1 | 121 | 860 |
Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center | 14.3 | 146 | 1023 |
Northwestern Medicine Lake Forest Hospital | 14.5 | 181 | 1252 |
Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital | 14.6 | 67 | 458 |
Northwestern Medicine Huntley Hospital | 14.8 | 164 | 1111 |